It was
announced last week that Charles Hutchinson, Arts Editor for York Press, is
under threat from redundancy. You
can read up for more context here. This
blog is about the local issue of Charles’ valuable position within the York
scene, but I hope it resonates with all local communities that feed into and
support one another.
I have old
clippings from the very first shows I was in as a Youth Theatre member where
Charles reviewed the shows. Part of the
struggle of Youth Theatre is to get noticed by press, nationally and
locally. It is simply not recognised as
a ‘proper’ artform by the gate-keepers of the culture, whether the staff of
magazines and newspapers themselves or even, sadly, the Marketing Department of
theatre buildings. But Charles would
come and review Youth Theatre, and continues to do so. It is amazing to say to a young cast we have
a reviewer in, and their work will be treated fairly by someone in the paper
for all their family to see. There
cannot be many reviewers for local papers up and down this country who will
readily come and watch, review and champion Youth Theatre. This is one of Charles’s many mighty traits.
Charles must
have reviewed every theatre company in this city at some point, giving them
time and space in his columns. York has
a wide art scene, and Charles could quite easily focus on the larger
theatres. But he also visits the pub
shows and the site-specific works when he can.
What does
this all matter? It shows that someone
with power cares about your work. That
someone in a privileged position can give you space in the local paper, and a
platform. Actually there’s a lot of
kindness and generosity in how Charles navigates the scene.
Of course, I
have issues with the chap. We’ve been
trying to drag him down to Say Owt
gigs for years (even though he always does a lovely preview for us). We argued about his call to chop out the
Porter in Macbeth (the only working class character!). And I’ll be perfectly honest, I know some
people across the network take issue with certain elements of Charles’ reviews
or approaches. But there is no denying he’s
always up for a lovely healthy debate and natter, whether about theatre or
Elvis Costello. He’s amicable and
approachable around when you bump into him, always up for a chuckle and puts
his heart into the scene. And it sets a
great example for cross-promotion, watching each other’s back and valuing our
art.
It’s not
just the fact we need an Arts Editor for the main paper in the city, but that
we need them to be a chummy and committed person like Charles.
I write this
because I hope Charles can remain as long as he feels he can best serve York,
and that the role of Arts Editor will still exist as a vital lynchpin of such a
cultural hub.
No comments:
Post a Comment